Dopage du Jour

The Olympic message: cheat

noreply@blogger.com (gtveloce) — Thu, 21 Aug 2008 00:45:00 +0000

Well, maybe, maybe not. For every one caught in testing, how many are missed? We are led to believe that a "catch" is a sign that "the system works". However if we don't know who is getting away with it how can we claim success? All we can say for sure is that those who are caught face humiliation and varying degrees of punishment, depending upon the severity, any past infringements and the sport concerned. Fair? Maybe, maybe not?

Ukraine's Olympic heptathlon silver medallist Liudmyla Blonska has failed a drugs test, the IOC confirmed. The 30-year-old's A sample tested positive for a banned substance, but the IOC source said they were still awaiting the results of the B sample.Blonska's is the fifth drugs case of the Beijing Games. Spanish cyclist Maria Isabel Moreno tested positive for EPO, North Korean shooting medallist Kim-Jong-Su (betablockers), Vietnamese gymnast Do Thi Ngan Thuong (diuretic) while Greece's rarely seen 2004 Olympic 400 metres hurdles champion Fani Halkia, tested positive for steroids at a training camp.

Panic stations, I've been tested!

noreply@blogger.com (gtveloce) — Tue, 12 Aug 2008 04:59:00 +0000

Well this would be a difficult situation. You are selected for the Olympics and just don't want to let go of the dream. You have taken some EPO and know you'll get caught if the vampires actually test you, but you just haven't been tested lately - if at all. You expect attention will be on the favourites, not on little ol' you anyway. And then you get called to testing. Sometimes a doper just doesn't turn up, and gets in trouble anyway. And sometimes they get away with it. And sometimes they don't.

Moreno, better known as Maribel Moreno, had been entered for the women's road race and individual time trial and tested positive for the endurance-boosting EPO drug. IOC spokesperson Giselle Davies said Moreno was tested on July 31 and left the city on the same evening. The IOC officially took control of drugs testing on July 27.

Maribel appears to have panicked and broke down in tears after the testing - but before the result. I guess we can understand why. But do we blame her, or her supplier? Or the system?

I'm not saying he's innocent, but...

noreply@blogger.com (gtveloce) — Wed, 06 Aug 2008 23:44:00 +0000

Then again I am saying something like 'we can't be so certain about these things'. Read it and weep: In the case of Landis, who had no previous record of doping violations, the chances that the positive result could result from anything except cheating - a lab error, an abnormally high natural occurrence of testosterone - were dismissed as not credible. The problem, Mr Berry said, is that for the actual process used by doping labs there is no body of scientific data to show just how rare "false positives" or "false negatives" really are, and that such data is essential for interpreting lab results.

Introducing probabilities into drug testing is interesting and debatable, but I accept the basic premise - that a false positive (or negative) is always possible. Look at Ricco's statement that he took CERA and should have been caught multiple times, but wasn't. Hence we run multiple tests and develop (now, at least) a longitudinal profile of an athlete. So any 'aberrant' values will appear over time and can be tracked without jumping to conclusions over one single test on one sole sample. Even better (or complementary) is the idea for certain pre-identified markers to be identified or inserted into drugs as "tags" that can be easily identified.

So will Landis take this as more evidence for his side of the case, or has he simply agreed to disagree and move on? If he is innocent, what of the human cost here? Are we doing the right thing with these so-called drug "cheats" or are we making what could be unemotional technical points highly emotive and "charged" with guilt, suspicion and pain - and thus feeding the media monster instead of protecting the athletes?

Giro hero Sella caught out

noreply@blogger.com (gtveloce) — Tue, 05 Aug 2008 21:47:00 +0000

It doesn't take too much to get noticed by the wrong people. Win a few stages, especially in a dramatic way and you can make a real name for yourself. And get 'targeted' by the drug cops.

Winner of three stages and the climber's competition of the Giro d'Italia, Italian Emanuele Sella, has been found positive in an out-of-competition doping control issued by the International Cycling Union (UCI) on July 23, according to La Gazzetta dello Sport. The 27 year-old from Vicenza was found to have used the same third generation EPO – CERA (Continuous Erythropoietin Receptor Activator) – that Riccardo Riccò admitted to using in the Tour de France.

Ricco, now Sella. It's certainly a good advert for CERA. It works.

A fine Colombian catch

noreply@blogger.com (gtveloce) — Sun, 03 Aug 2008 22:42:00 +0000

Quite a few names, little detail: The Colombian Cycling Federation announced Friday that six riders had returned positive doping controls during the Vuelta a Colombia in May. The federation did not specify the substances which caused the adverse analytical findings for Rafael Montiel, Juan Guillermo Castro, Camilo Gomez, Carlos Ospina Hernandez, Hernan Buenahora and Giovanni Barriga.

Who do you believe?

noreply@blogger.com (gtveloce) — Fri, 01 Aug 2008 00:55:00 +0000

Young rising star with much to gain, brilliant climber and self-confessed Pantani fan: Ricco tests positive, yet denies all. Gets sacked, backtracks and admits to EPO use. Denies doping before Le Tour but let's re-check his Giro blood samples just in case...
Piepoli, climber with long and distinguished career: what could he achieve by doping? To extend his career? A last-ditch superannuation payment? He's Ricco's roommate and is reported to have confessed, is sacked by team to show that it means business, but denies all. From CN: "The 36-year-old Piepoli, who had not tested positive but, as the room-mate of Ricco during the Tour, was sacked by his team for violating the code of ethics "denied everything" after being questioned by CONI"
Gusev, another rider facing retirement after a good career is caught out by internal team tests and dismissed. He refutes this "guilt" and threatens a lawsuit, raising speculation that the team (Astana) timed this sacking with Le Tour to get in the 'good books' with ASO - as proof they are cracking down on cheats and punishing them. But doesn't Gusev's sacking actually taint Astana, "proving" that cheats lurk within? Why would they bring this to light during Le Tour?
Bossoni and Carini test positive in June at the Italian national championships: "Two Italian cyclists tested positive for EPO in June, the Italian National Olympic Committee (CONI) announced Thursday. The first, Giovanni Carini (Pagnoncelli NGC Perrel), tested positive after winning the Elite without contract category at the Italian National Championships in Boltiere. The second, Paolo Bossoni (Lampre) the following day after the elite men's road race"
Sacked Euskaltel rider Pena has been cleared: "Aketza Pena was declared not guilty of doping by the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) on Thursday, according to a statement by the rider reported in Marca. The Spaniard tested positive for nandrolone at the 2007 Giro del Trentino, and was suspended from his Euskaltel-Euskadi. He had received a two-year suspension by the Spanish Cycling Federation (RFEC) in August, 2007. His contract with Euskaltel-Euskadi was not renewed and he abandoned his cycling career". Ouch.
Does anyone believe any of this? Whole teams (like Astana) are denied access to Le Tour because of past "activites", despite new management. Athletes are sacked without a positive test, and others test positive and are sacked yet later are cleared. Is it all a publicity-driven shambles? Are we jumping to too many conclusions, too quickly?

Ricco admits to EPO and suggests test failure

noreply@blogger.com (gtveloce) — Thu, 31 Jul 2008 08:01:00 +0000

At least he's honest - eventually. Riccò has withdrawn his request to have a counter-analysis done on the B-sample, but said that the testing procedure needed some work. "Of the 10 controls taken, only two were positive. In theory all the tests should have been positive, therefore the method needs to be checked," he said.

I guess the tests need a bit of work, then? On this basis maybe a few other riders, other than those lucky enough to not get tested, slipped the net. (Bearing in mind the biological passports will help, but only if no-exceptions longitudinal analysis is done.)

On frogs and fatigue: stimulating reading at the end of Le Tour

noreply@blogger.com (gtveloce) — Sun, 27 Jul 2008 22:24:00 +0000

Great work by Sastre to win overall, and for Steegmans to take it into Paris. Now onto the more stimulating side of the sport - can't get a natural high? Try this: Kazakh rider Dmitriy Fofonov was fired from his team and detained by French police for questioning after it was announced that he tested positive for a banned stimulant, heptaminol. The French Anti-doping Agency president Pierre Bordry said that the now former Crédit Agricole rider had tested positive for "very heavy dose" of the drug.

Being Kazakh has nothing to do with it and we should dismiss that as a coincidence. But why heptaminol? Heptaminol chlorhydrate is a common cardiac stimulant and vasodilator, widely used for the treatment of orthostatic hypotension - or low blood pressure if you like. A 'usual' dose may be 500-1500 mg or so, orally. Whilst it is structurally similar to methamphetamine, it's a different thing. So why take it? Presumably it will give you a lift and keep you going, and may help 'open the lungs' a little. This is certainly an interesting result, if you are a frog: Heptaminol stopped or delayed the progressive decline in tension which characterizes the phenomenon of fatigue in frog isolated twitch muscle fibre. Presumably Fofonov, if actually guilty as charged, acts like a frog in this case.

Ex-rider ex-Astana ex-Disco

noreply@blogger.com (gtveloce) — Sat, 26 Jul 2008 06:48:00 +0000

Another one bites the dust. Gusev gets cut from Astana because of "irregular blood values".

"Vladimir Gusev has been officially notified that he no longer represents Team Astana," Bruyneel said. "Our Kazakh sponsors have also been made aware of this decision and are fully supportive." Gusev, 26, the now former team-mate of 2007 Tour de France winner Alberto Contador, came over to the Discovery Channel team from Team CSC in 2006. He followed Bruyneel from that team to Astana this year. A four-time Russian time trial champion, Gusev was considered to be a Classics specialist, finishing fifth in the 2007 Tour of Flanders. But he stunned the cycling world by taking a mountain stage win and the climber's jersey at the Tour de Suisse that year.

Add him to the growing list of ex-Discovery riders with similar blood problems. Not that it's a causal relationship, mind. Just a correlation.

Vaughters avoids saying what we can all assume

noreply@blogger.com (gtveloce) — Mon, 21 Jul 2008 01:25:00 +0000

Judge for yourself. Read this article and imagine what possibilities emerge.

Vaughters and the wasp (I remember this well):Vaughters was distraught. “But that’s ridiculous . . . I can’t see! I can’t ride my bike! How will I finish the race?” “I’m sorry Jonathan,” the doctor replied. “I can give you the injection but you will have to abandon the race. There are no exemptions for allergies. We have to do this by the book.”

Vaughters struggles on with the swelling but meets another rider: As he made his way to the start line, aching with disappointment, he crossed the path of a chap he describes as “a famous rider”. Most of the other racers had greeted him with sympathy that morning but this particular rider didn’t do sympathy. No, his speciality was contempt. “Poor Jonathan and his stupid little team,” he spat. “What the f*** are you like? If you were on my team this would have been taken care of, but now you are not going to finish the Tour de France because of a wasp sting.”

Vaughters is asked if he saw doping at US Postal: “No, of course, and I wouldn’t expect that. I guess I would just say that my time at US Postal Service was . . . I kind of almost have to leave that as a ‘No comment’. And you can take that however you would like.”

And I'll leave the rest to you.

Hearsay and rumour

noreply@blogger.com (gtveloce) — Sun, 20 Jul 2008 01:42:00 +0000

It's just talk, but there was talk about Ricco too, before he fell off the doping cliff. Via CN, El Pais reported that Italian Leonardo Piepoli, the winner of stage 10, confessed to his directeur sportif Joxean Fernandez Matxin to using EPO. After his team-mate Riccardo Riccò was taken away by police after testing positive for EPO, Piepoli reportedly said to Matxin, "I have done the same as Riccardo." No positive doping control has been announced yet for Piepoli, but the team's manager, Mauro Gianetti, pulled the entire squad out of the race. Riccò was indicted on the same charges as Duenas in a court in Foix, but denied using EPO.

No, not Piepoli, please!

Slight irony in that blood-doper, Tour star and denier Tyler Hamilton's continuing comeback is reported on in the same page of CN: Rock Racing's Tyler Hamilton looks set to take the overall victory in the Tour of Qinghai Lake in China tomorrow after he successfully defended his lead in the second to last stage through the high Mountains on the Tibetan Plateau.

Moreau and corticosteroids?

noreply@blogger.com (gtveloce) — Thu, 17 Jul 2008 13:20:00 +0000

Speculation is rife about riders who have abandoned without obvious injury. Moreau comes to mind: French newspaper Le Monde has cast doubts over the former Tour de France stage winner. Confirming that Moreau's blood values did not present any anomalies prior to the Grande Boucle, the paper however alleged that Moreau was sent a letter from the French federation doctor after Paris-Nice this spring. In the letter, the rider was notified of his too low blood cortisol values and asked to stop competing for a while. Along with hematocrit, haemoglobin and reticulocytes, cortisol is part of the French "suivi longitudinal" anti-doping controls, a system similar to the UCI's blood passport, but that has been in place since 1999. Low cortisol in the blood is said to be directly related to the intake of corticoids, which block the natural production of cortisol. According to Le Monde, Moreau is the only French rider who was notified with a "counter-indication to the practice of cycling" in this way.

Yes, prolonged use of glucocorticosteroids will suppress natural cortisol levels, but what is the benefit? These drugs will definitely increase your anxiety and bring anger to the surface more readily, which may help you in a sprint... or not. I wouldn't want to be riding beside an angry or anxious sprinter myself ;-)

Alternatively a rider may seek to use these drugs to reduce muscle mass (they are catabolic, not anabolic steroids). Typically you get thinner skin, and lose both muscle and bone minerals. You may therefore get lighter, but they also cause you to retain water... so the benefit is hard to pin down.

3 down, 7 to go?

noreply@blogger.com (gtveloce) — Thu, 17 Jul 2008 13:13:00 +0000

If there were 10 riders in Le Tour with 'abnormal values', do we have a case of 3 down, 7 to go?

French newspaper L'Equipe reported that Beltran was one of 10 riders found by the AFLD to have abnormal blood values in the days prior to the Tour. On July 3 and 4, the AFLD performed blood tests on riders "to allow for subsequent targeted doping tests during the Tour de France", the agency announced Friday.

Or have some of these riders already abandoned, for whatever reason?

Not to mention Duenas

noreply@blogger.com (gtveloce) — Thu, 17 Jul 2008 13:10:00 +0000

It's never too late to mention a rider caught out, is it? For the record, another non-negative for EPO in this year's tour: Spanish rider Moisés Dueñas has become the second rider to register a non-negative test for banned blood booster erythropoietin at the Tour de France. The results came from a sample taken from the Barloworld rider after the Grand Tour's first time trial, Stage 4 on July 8 in Cholet, according to head of the French Anti-doping Agency (AFLD) Pierre Bordry.

Ricco takes Pantani too literally

noreply@blogger.com (gtveloce) — Thu, 17 Jul 2008 13:04:00 +0000

Self-confessed Pantani fan with a 'naturally high' haematocrit has seemingly been caught out. And is thus out of Le Tour and into police custody. What can one say? Beltran at least was at the end of his career... what was Ricco thinking?

Italian rider Riccardo Riccò of Saunier Duval has tested positive for blood booster Erythropoietin (EPO), French sports daily L'Equipe reported on its website on Thursday. According to the paper's Damien Ressiot, one of the climber's urine samples collected by the French Anti-Doping Agency AFLD showed traces of a third generation EPO called CERA (Continuous Erythropoietin Receptor Activator).

Of course he could be innocent. Of course.

Beltran exits stage left

noreply@blogger.com (gtveloce) — Mon, 14 Jul 2008 01:10:00 +0000

One of Lance's faithful lieutenants has been caught out with EPO. Yes, it's been a while since Lance raced with the guy, and there's no evidence to suggest that Beltran used EPO before this year, but one's mind does wonder at why he should do so now. The obvious answer is to make it a bit easier in the twilight of his career. A career now effectively ended, I suspect.

Dane Bjarne Riis, head of Team CSC-Saxo Bank, looked at the positive side of Manuel Beltrán's "A" sample test result which resulted in the dismissal of the "scandalous" Spaniard from the Tour de France. He said the sport's anti-doping controls were working. "It is bad for cycling, without saying it is a 'scandal' – he is the 'scandal,'" said Riis to Cyclingnews the morning after Beltrán was asked to leave the Tour de France for his positive Erythropoietin (EPO) test. "The controls work. The system works. Those who don't understand, like him, have to leave." The classification rider of Team Liquigas was caught in a French anti-doping agency (AFLD) control following stage one that led to a positive EPO result. All the Tour de France controls are being carried out by the AFLD, which is different than in past years when handled by the International Cycling Union (UCI).

Of course Riis is right, and the kerfuffle has already died down. Let's hope that's it for Le Tour and Le Dope Scandal this year.

McMurdo cops steroid ban

noreply@blogger.com (gtveloce) — Wed, 02 Jul 2008 23:16:00 +0000

At least he accepted it as fact (or is that too bold an assumption?) and didn't ask for a hearing. He got 2 years. It's sad as he had some great results in the period in question, and it's doubtful that the steroids themselves had as powerful an effect as the placebo value alone.

Australian domestic cyclist Hilton McMurdo has been handed a two year sanction by Cycling Australia (CA) for his use of anabolic steroids. The Australian Sports Anti-Doping Authority (ASADA) yesterday acknowledged CA's decision to sanction McMurdo for the doping violation.

Rasmussen gets his due

noreply@blogger.com (gtveloce) — Wed, 02 Jul 2008 01:52:00 +0000

Will he cop it sweet or appeal? Do we care anymore? Rasmussen gets 2 years for telling fibs about where he was, or wasn't... Nearly one year after he was forced to leave the Tour de France while wearing the race leader's maillot jaune, Danish cyclist Michael Rasmussen has been suspended for two years for missing out-of-competition doping controls prior to the race.

Still, it did make for an interesting, if confused, L eTour. It's hard to believe Landis won and lost 2 years ago, and Rasmussen was pulled out just a year ago. This year, of course, we have Boonen sidelined (even if his drink was spiked) and Contador sitting it out 'cause Astana is a bad word around Paris. Cross your fingers, it'll all start again soon enough.

Professionalism re-defined

noreply@blogger.com (gtveloce) — Thu, 26 Jun 2008 00:53:00 +0000

What makes a professional bike racer? Is it someone who simply rides for cash? Is it a racer who also rides clean? Or is it a bike rider who does everything possible to maintain optimum performance? Including doping?

With that thought in mind, here's an interesting quote from David Millar, via CN: Millar walks through his career, saying he was naive about the prevalence of doping in the sport when he started as an amateur and said doping "went against everything I stood for." Millar then speaks about a point in his early days as a professional after he won a race when he showed a team-mate that his natural hematocrit level at the time was 8 points below the UCI allowable 50 percent. "I saw it as showing him that you could win without doping," Millar says in the show but adds that his team-mates response was that Millar was unprofessional to not have a hematocrit level right at the allowable limits. The message, he said, was that doping was considered normal and expected.

The race you win when you aren't racing

noreply@blogger.com (gtveloce) — Sat, 21 Jun 2008 00:27:00 +0000

I won't comment, really, I won't: When the Kazakh cycling federation handed down its decision in December 2007, the UCI had initially planned an appeal to the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS), but subsequently withdrew after Vinokourov announced his retirement from professional cycling. However, on May 31 Vinokourov participated in - and won - the Laurentine Kivilev, a 100 km race held on the French Riviera as a tribute to his compatriot Andrei Kivilev, who died at the 2003 Paris-Nice. Vinokourov revealed at the event that he was training three times per week, but denied a comeback was on the cards.

HGH a fizzer?

noreply@blogger.com (gtveloce) — Fri, 20 Jun 2008 23:57:00 +0000

Do we now distinguish between drugs that actually work and drugs that only work because we think they work? We already control substances that both work and don't work and have bad side-effects (like gluocorticosteroids), so controlling a substance that probably doesn't work and hurts you still makes some sense. I think.

The researchers concluded, "The results of this study suggest that the placebo effect may be responsible, at least in part, for the perceived athletic benefit of doping with growth hormone for some people."

Or do we ban placebos?

It goes on and on

noreply@blogger.com (gtveloce) — Fri, 20 Jun 2008 23:54:00 +0000

Just a progress report on another "attempted" use of dope... in case you missed it: Italy's Ruggero Marzoli has been disqualified by the Italian cycling federation (FCI) for six months for his involvement in the Oil for Drugs investigation involving Doctor Carlo Santuccione. The 32 year-old will be able to return to racing October 17. Despite an appeal made on March 31 to the Italian Olympic Committee (CONI), the FCI appeals commission ruled, "he is liable for frequenting Doctor Carlo Santuccione, limited and without membership ... therefore it is considered guilty of attempted use of prohibited substances and a sanction is imposed."

Aussie TT dominator back in November

noreply@blogger.com (gtveloce) — Fri, 20 Jun 2008 23:48:00 +0000

Well he would be satisfied, surely? Australia's Nathan O'Neill is satisfied with the outcome of his Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) appeal, which sees him able to return to the sport on November 12. O'Neill will return to the United States of America on Monday, where he will begin training and start to focus contract negotiations for the 2009 season. O'Neill tested positive for the stimulant Phentermine in an in-competition test on August 12, 2007, during the Tour of Elk Grove in the USA. While the eight-time Australian Time Trial Champion is allowed to use the appetite suppressant out of competition, traces of the substance remained in his system during the event.

O'Neill has published some interesting ideas on weight control in Aussie cycling mags. So was the Phentermine part of his program? You'd have to say yes, but I hadn't seen it in print before, strangely. So is it still OK out-of-season? Is it a case of anything goes, at least with weight loss? Or was the Phentermine part of a larger picture? Nathan, please tell us what you think...

Boonen stays out of sight... briefly

noreply@blogger.com (gtveloce) — Fri, 20 Jun 2008 23:43:00 +0000

Nasty recreational cocaine-taker one day, winner the next. You'd imagine he'd like to stay out of sight for a while, but no... Tom Boonen recovered from his rather tough few weeks with a trademark Boonen sprint victory, crossing the line just ahead of his lead-out man Wouter Weylandt while notable speedsters Mark Cavendish, Matthi Breschel and Graeme Brown were left in his wake. The Belgian, who tested positive for cocaine and had his invitations to the Tour de France as well as the Tour de Suisse revoked, had a quiet first three stages, but was back to his old form on stage four of the Ster Elektrotoer. He and Weylandt crossed the line a full bike length ahead of third placed Nikolai Trusov (Tinkoff). Enrico Gasparotto of Team Barloworld retained the leader's jersey.

Boonen sorry, of course

noreply@blogger.com (gtveloce) — Sun, 15 Jun 2008 22:42:00 +0000

Well it is a personal issue, isn't it? It's a stretch to say that cocaine will improve your cycling; rather it's a social, recreational drug for people with a bit of cash to play with. And a popular one at that. So when we get upset at Tom Boonen's lapse of judgement we are really getting upset at our own community, its double-standards and its penchant for social drugs of all kinds. Cocaine is but one; the biggest drug of choice by far, is alcohol. Do we get upset about cyclists or other sportspeople abusing alcohol? Perhaps not as often as we should...

From CN: Belgian Tom Boonen will not be sanctioned by his team for his positive cocaine test, it was announced Wednesday morning at a press conference in Wielsbeke, Belgium. The 27 year-old Quick Step rider apologised for his actions and said that he would take a short break from competition. The team continued to show its support for the sprinter, as did the sponsor, which prolonged its contract.