We do try to cover our costs by selling mugs, teeshirts, hats, bags, stickers and images... | ||||
The A2W large mug! |
The GTVeloce mug! |
OODB large mug! |
The Tipo116 large mug! |
Yet another mug! |
OK, so we are still driving and relying upon driving our cars too much.
Agreed? No?
Seems that we like driving. It's independent. It's available all day and
all night, when we want. It goes door to door. It carries loads, or
passengers. It's handy. And we have moved our shops away from walking
distance so we must drive to get there. And our favourite places are either
a long, long way away or simply away from public transport, so again we
need a car. And we have chosen to build our houses away from public
transport. So again, to get to work we must drive. And we have cemented
this sort of 'design' in place. It's bricks and mortar. To do it another
way means knocking it down and building it again. New train and tram lines
to go to suburbs poorly serviced now. Perhaps closing shopping centres and
dispersing the shops closer to the houses.
So whose fault is that? Do we blame governments because they encouraged
this freedom to travel by building better roads? Or did we want that?
Should we have said no? Should they have said no? Is it the government's
fault that they ran down other infrastructure - like public transport -
because we wanted cars? Or do we blame the car manaufacturers? It's chicken
and egg stuff but really the car companies have had it all their own way
for a long time. They needed smoother roads and more roads to allow their
customers to get places. Governments agreed and funded it - subsidised it.
The manufacturers made cars easier to drive and resisted real safety
measures - like roll cages, proper harnesses or helmets - to encourage
maximum sales. They prefer to sell - because they know you will buy -
comfy, quiet, smooth riding, powerful and easy-to-drive cars. If they had
to build slower, safer cars that gave you a better feeling for the road and
the environment you were driving through - rather than the splendid
isolation you get these days, they'd probably sell fewer cars. So they
lobbied governments for what they wanted. And won.
And look at what we've got. Great freedom, and cars everywhere. Pedestrians
are scared to cross roads, especially when the roads get wider and wider.
Bike riders are discouraged by the traffic. Car drivers are so isolated in
their tin cans they can't feel the wind or the road surface or hear the
wind rushing past, so they go too fast. And so we increase the fear felt by
pedestrians and cyclists. And discourage exercise. And increase our general
morbidity. Is this what we set out to achieve?
Let's rethink. We are running out of oil so let's spend some brain power on
re-inventing our private/public transport direction. Now, not later. Just a
thought!
Gotta go - must jump in the car and drive a massive 1.1km to the shops!
Cheers
Rob.
September 2004 March 2005 April 2005 May 2005 September 2005 October 2005 December 2005 January 2006 February 2006 March 2006 April 2006 May 2006 July 2006 August 2006 September 2006 October 2006 November 2006 December 2006 February 2007 April 2007
Subscribe to Posts [Atom]
Brain Lateralization Test Results
|
Right Brain (40%) The right hemisphere is the visual, figurative, artistic, and intuitive side of the brain. Left Brain (70%) The left hemisphere is the logical, articulate, assertive, and practical side of the brain |
INTJ - "Mastermind". Introverted intellectual with a preference for finding certainty. A builder of systems and the applier of theoretical models. 2.1% of total population.
|
These posts represent my opinions only and may have little or no association with the facts as you see them. Look elsewhere, think, make up your own minds. If I quote someone else I attribute.
If I recommend a web site it's because I use it myself. If an advert appears
it's because I affiliate with Google and others similar in nature and usually means nothing more than that...
the Internet is a wild and untamed place folks, so please tread warily.
My opinions are just that and do not constitute advice or legal opinion
of any sort.
All original material is copyright 2008 by myself, too, in accord with the Creative Commons licence (see below).