Grand touring in a veloce style...
A site full of Alfa Romeos...especially tipo 116 'Alfettas' in AustraliaHi, I'm Rob, and this is a wandering diatribe of sorts, focused on the human and environmental tragedy that is motoring with an Alfa Romeo. I was sucked into the vortex
with my first ride in a 105 series Bertone coupe, and blundered from a superb 1.8 Giulietta into an amazing, if flawed, 33ti; only to finally achieve Nirvana with what
I wanted all along - a Tipo 116 GTV 2.0. (I should mention the Golfs, the Swift GTis, the Ford Escorts and the Turbo 4WD Laser TX3 as well, but I won't). But this blog could just as well be about bicycles, music, mythology, philosophy, photography or art.
You can check the lot out right here.
Whatever fits: if it has a recommended torque setting, or can be digitised, it's in.
| We do try to cover our costs by selling mugs, teeshirts, hats, bags, stickers and images... | ||||
 The A2W large mug! |
 The GTVeloce mug! |
 OODB large mug! |
 The Tipo116 large mug! |
 Yet another mug! |
Tuesday, May 30, 2006
Hydrogen and realism
Interesting indeed that they are producing the hydrogen onsite. Better, cheaper and safer than trying to transport it. The hydrogen is for a small H-dedicated bus fleet, by the way. The article admits "Electrolysis is an energy-intensive process, in itself, and if you were to follow the wires leading out from the back of the station, they'd connect to the big towers snaking east, nearly 30 kilometers into the country's rugged interior...As they approach the source, one can spot steam pluming into the sky. Some are natural vents, hinting at the violence roiling deep beneath the rocky soil." It's geo-thermal, folks.
So hydrogen is do-able, despite lower energy density and higher volatility. Especially so if you have locally renewable energy such as hydro or geothermal sources to tap into. In most countries you just don't have that sort of energy locally available, of course. So we resort to oil or coal. Which defeats the benefits of using H in the first place. Of course there is also Nuclear power but again the production of the right blend of uranium isotopes is energy intensive. So you end up spending energy to make energy. Are we ever to get out of this cycle of fossil-fuel dependence? What will it take?
Archives
May 2006 June 2006 July 2006 August 2006 September 2006 October 2006 November 2006 December 2006 January 2007 March 2007 April 2007 August 2007 January 2008 March 2008 April 2008 May 2008 June 2008 July 2008 October 2008 November 2008 March 2009 April 2009 June 2009 March 2010
Subscribe to Posts [Atom]
