Electric cars - laudable but not 'carbon free' #environment #autos
Electric cars are certainly quieter, potentially more reliable and more durable than what we have now. And they make a lot of sense as a driving experience with their seamless instant-on torque delivery, but that doesn't mean that they are "perfect" or "green" or even better than anything else in every situation. They are an option, and a worthy one, if you really need to propel yourself and a tonne or so of metal and plastic around. I also know that the car-fan media is obsessed with "fuel" to the exclusion of all else. But really, this goes a bit too far:While Tesla’s electric cars grab headlines across the globe, a company in the NSW country town of Armidale is quietly developing its own contribution to carbon-free motoring.
Exactly how "carbon-free" is any electric car? Was it manufactured without burning fossil fuels? (Certainly not in this case - I can see plenty of coal-fired furnaces at work here.) Was it shipped around post-manufacture without emitting carbon? (Unlikely.) Were the raw materials mined or made without a single atom of carbon getting lost along the way? (Hmmm.)
What they (the media outlet) mean is that it's not a petrol car, it's electric. I think we gathered that anyway. Like the uncritical Top Gear fascination with hydrogen, it stumbles on a key point: it takes energy to make, store and move energy. Whilst making electric or hydrogen-powered cars may lead to a cleaner atmosphere in our cities, and whilst driving such cars may eventually be sustainable in some narrow sense, they still have to be made and distributed, and the energy to move it must come from somewhere as well. There's no free ride here folks.