Bikes? Bike racing? Italian cars? Images? Music? Sustainable corporate environmental-ism? Ouch, my brain hurts! Just search gtveloce thanks!

Lijit Search

OffLine

For sustainability --> villages not motorways and car parks --> eco-friendly gadgets --> small cars, fast bicycles and a smaller footprint for humanity on this planet...

Monday, July 02, 2007

It ain't necessarily so...

I've been amused and befuddled lately by people, usually "experts" who appear to downright lie, don't tell the whole truth, or simply don't know (and its corollary, 'make it up'). Yes, I know, it's my pet peeve again.

Let's start from the top. It's a strange list but bear with me.

Climate change. It's not proven "fact" and in fact almost impossible to prove that human activity is to blame. That does not make it irrelevant, however. The world is warming and ice is melting earlier in the spring than ever before. Our climate is changing and it may well accelerate from here, or it may not. It's a guessing game but one with consequences. So do you go around debunking climate change, or join in - just in case? I'm a joiner, both because it's a reasonable bet that any action we take may help to arrest the warming, and also that what we are doing to arrest climate change is a good thing anyway. Why go on and on wasting resources like oil and gas? Why not save some for later? Why risk the planet on just the hope that emitting mega-tonnes of Carbon dioxide doesn't matter?

The Golf GT 1.4 and its turbo supercharged engine. Hey I told you it's a weird list. I keep reading gushing reviews that run from 'why didn't someone think of this before' to 'what a fantastic idea that's never before been possible'. Well like most things carmakers do its (a) been done before by another car maker - ie Lancia (with the Delta Integrale) and (b) been done even further back in time by an aircraft manufacturer (or engine manufacturer to be more precise - Wright and its turbo-supercharged direct injected 1944 Cyclone amongst many others - just search on 1940s and 50s airplane engine technology to see how slack auto engineering really is!).

Hybrid car engines. Same as above except think train (locomotive) manufacturers. Ever wondered who invented regenerative braking before Toyota used it on the Prius et al? Well trams (streetcars, if you prefer) had that feature many decades ago. Diesel engined locos making electricity to drive wheels, ditto. It may be refined and put in a car context but let's not pretend it's new.

Hybrids are more efficient. More efficent than what? Than a car of the same carrying capacity? Big deal. Why not avoid the complexity and just buy a smaller car - or drive less? So the Prius and its ilk save some petrol in comparison to other oversized tanks... but what exactly is the environmental cost of making a complex petrol/electric hybrid car vs a simpler, smaller-engined petrol-only car? We never see that comparison, do we? Cars are developed, made, transported, shipped, serviced... all of this takes energy before you even move the thing under its own "steam". What are the real costs of developing and making petrol/electric hybrids? What would an independent whole-of-life assessment of energy use reveal?

Everyone should have solar panels because it's cheaper and greener. Cheaper and greener than what? Building a central generator and containing the pollution and resource use in one spot, to be managed in that one location? Versus dispersing the pollution and effort around hundreds of manufacturers and millions of sites? Have you actually done the sums? If everyone invested in solar panels that'd be a huge number of solar panels made, supported by mining of course, transported to millions of sites (probably using diesel and petrol to get there) , hooked up by metres of copper wiring in each house, installed by thousands of technicians... are you sure that capturing maybe 35% of the power of the sun is actually more efficient than all other forms of power generation, when we never actually see the calculations, just the assertions?

And so on. I feel better now.

Labels: , , , ,

blog comments powered by Disqus

-->

These posts represent my opinions only and may have little or no association with the facts as you see them. Look elsewhere, think, make up your own minds. If I quote someone else I attribute. If I recommend a web site it's because I use it myself. If an advert appears it's because I affiliate with Google and others similar in nature and usually means nothing more than that... the Internet is a wild and untamed place folks, so please tread warily. My opinions are just that and do not constitute advice or legal opinion of any sort.
All original material is copyright 2008 by myself, too, in accord with the Creative Commons licence (see below).



QuickLinks: Addicted2Wheels Autoexpo 2000 GTVeloce Automotive Gallery GTVeloce.com GTVeloce Image Library Fort Street High School Class of 75 All purpose Chatroom Userplane Chat Fortian Image Gallery 1975 Flora Gallery Miscellaneous Image Gallery Bike Racing Gallery Airliner Gallery Airline Postcard Gallery Gerry's Gallery GTVeloce rave on Alfa Romeos Alfa Gallery Automotive How-to Index Staying Alive Handling 101 Handling 102 Handling 103 Tyrepressures Camber Toe Caster Polar Moment Roll Oversteer Understeer Weight transfer Coil springs Wheels and Tyres Pitch Heel and Toe Double Declutch Offset Rollbars BMEP calculator Cornering load calculator GTVeloce Blog Offline Blog Out Out Damned Blog Addicted2Wheels Blog The Spiel on business MBA Resources HR Resources KM Reframed Bike Racing forum KlausenRussell Com-munity Chain Chatter Unofficial RBCC info Official RBCC info Unofficial CCCC info Official CCCC info Rob's Guide to Road, Crit and Track Racing Rob's Guide, part 2 Track race tips Sydney's Velodromes What do those lines mean? Automobile links Mustknow links Philosophy links Music Links Images of the Russell, Matthews, O'Brien and Brown families in Australia Rob's Amateur Art Gallery The GTVeloce GiftShop The GTVeloce Shopfront Rob Russell's images at Image Tank



Creative Commons License